cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets

Just some years ago, searching for case precedent was a hard and time consuming activity, necessitating persons to search through print copies of case legislation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case law search alternatives, and many sources offer free access to case legislation.

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a properly-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.

Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may perhaps find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” usually are not binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

prolonged period petitioner was not considered for promotion, meeting of your departmental promotion committee and look at the petitioner (Promotion)

In this site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Checking out its provisions and the gravity of its punishment.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be 1 or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason with the decision on the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted in an argument.

forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the read more relevant factors. Read more

Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic for the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.

Though quite a few websites offer free case regulation, not all are equally reliable. It’s critical To guage the credibility of the source before depending on the information.

How much sway case legislation holds might vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To examine this concept, look at the following case legislation definition.

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it really is important that the case established the application with the precautionary principle where there is often a threat to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations of the State in protecting the right to a clean and healthy environment.

Although the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows for your possibility of reconsideration or commutation on the sentence in certain circumstances.